The power of
the 1st party claim is changing in value and in terms of being
required. The changes mean that uses, value and potential of the 1st
party claim has not been reached. It’s actually just the beginning of changes
to the power of your 1st party claims. We’re now in the early stage
of realizing the fuller potential of raising the value, of individual input. We
know that the claims we make as the 1st party can do more, and can play
a larger role at this time in history. As of today more jobs require that you are
in a positon to become aware of the new incoming claims. You may not need to be
aware of all incoming claims, but in a growing number of cases, it’s becoming a
requirement that you have the 1st party claims for proof.
As terms
like data breach became more frequent there is a realization of the value of
what’s stored. And at the same time bits of information, un-important to the
provider, were being weaved in to products with value. What’s missing is your equity
from that which is a compilation of all your experiences. At each stage of your life you have more to
share; stuff that previously was not there. We are creating uncaptured value
that was not there prior to the new era of data storage. The data-miners, IT workers
and the industries that employ them have created value; value from our 1st
party experiences. This growing industry is making products and services that
were previously unavailable, suddenly available. The products and possibilities
are lining the shelves of the marketplace as disrupters. Disrupting how problems
will be solved and how they will be defined forever.
Let me ask
you this; where are the best places to start collecting 1st party
claims, experiences and suggestions? It’s worth knowing because it’s a gold
rush to get the most and best information. The uses of 1st party
claims include validation, examination, theorizing and predictive analysis. Nothing
is wrong with capturing 1st party claims, the main problem is caused
by the handling and value sharing components in the policies. It has become
more mandatory today that we assign a value and requirement for citizen claims.
The reason for these new standards are mandated for tracking, trust, transparency
and benefits.
Susan was
one of 200 people selected to give
answers to 3 questions after an employment selection process. The 200
people were chosen to participate because their 1st party claims can
describe their experience. Comparing and contrasting 1st party claims
should be a part of organizing. When we are unfairly treated most of us get
that message as it comes from the one giving the treatment. Our failure to
address small grievances and perceptions can feed a larger problem. Leaving
small problems to feaster for personal or professional gain can be a strong
temptation.
From hiding
black mold to questionable medical experiments in prisons; problems of this
type are hiding practices that create negative social consequences. Hiding the
1st party claims are an act of anti-social behavior. It’s anti-social
behavior that is willing to make life for the rest of us more dangerous. Too
many public administrators are hiding the 1st party claims to save money,
protect friends and promote blindness through practice. This blindness opens an
environment for big corporations and institutions to hide a significant number
of 1st party claims that belong to the public domain.
The number of 1st party
claim collectors is growing. The importance, value and requirement of the 1st party
claim has grown significantly. And we‘re encouraging citizens to join
organizations that share the 1st party claims they collect. That
one habit will improve advocacy for their members. Effective citizen organizing
begins at the point you have a claim to share. One of the problems we’re
working on is how to capture the value from our particular 1st party
claims. At present we’re addressing that problem by creating an auditing process
for the claims. That process is designed to build organizing and advocacy
that’s starts at the point of awareness of a claim. A set of handling policies
have been emerging to give us a measurable value for each 1st party
claim. The process has made auditing to see if the problem-solving was easier
and/or more precise. Without the process of mate3.com networking, it would be
more difficult to bring improvement to advocacy for the average person. Without
the changes that we bring in terms of practices and policy it would be like
trying to settle a numbers dispute without the numbers. The individual that is
collecting our 1st party claims is important and must be
accountable. One of our best practices is to register those that are collecting
our 1st party claims. That practice makes it more possible and easier
to track and retrieve the collections of our claims on request.
Requiring 1st
party feedback experiences; after workshops, interviews, classes and contacts is
still being insightful. We’ve learned to stay positioned for becoming aware of the
incoming claims at the best possible point.
We’ve also
learned to use mate3.com networking to improve our position from which to
respond. The potential of matching and connecting advocacy and organizing is in
its early stage of development; but emerging rapidly. We’re
adding focus and policy making to the process so as to facilitate the work of the
problem solvers. When it comes to best practices and suggestions for empowering
the 1st party; mate3.com networking is bringing continuous practical
improvements. Denario is an organizer who worked directly with Perry Keys the VP
of mate3.com. Denario’s specialty became arranging the 1st party
claims for problem solving; he was first to introduce 1st party
reporting check-points to get more clarity among the impacted. Those check-points leverage the value of
our claims; and have created added opportunities for the 1st
parties. After the check-points yielded the expected insights; Denario set-up an agency to represent and promote the collectors
of specific 1st party claims.
The collectors and potential collectors that joined the agency had
solidarity on continuous engagement to solve problems. With the engagement of
various 1st party claim collectors we can more easily separate opinion,
theory and belief’s so the individual’s narrative can be manifested. The mate3
method is a filter for receiving 1st party claims and directing them
to those with similar claims, responsibilities and obligations.
Shortly
after Denario’s new agency was activated
we started generating odd-jobs that paid roughly 20% above the prevailing hourly
wage. The first jobs were limited but ranged from claim collecting, organizing and
door to door information distributing. After that we added public speaking jobs
to carry the invitation to join a mate3 connected group. Denario targeted the 1st
party claim givers and their supporters with the odd-jobs of collecting and sharing.
Later we added information workers, marketing workers and lobbyist. Finally we
contracted for legal and financial services and advice.
Within 30 days of Denario’s hit and run, 3 policies to validate good
advocacy emerged; (1)
having citizen oversight at checkpoints to validate the sources of input and
1st party claims. (2) Having transparency of input and 1st party claims
that are to be used to define the problem and validate the solutions. (3)
Using a Public Claims Posting Administrator more often to post the
incoming 1st party claims for public review.
Angela Reiss and her friends were allies of big
tech who wanted the mate3.com formula, codes, e-mail lists, strategies etc... Angela
had become an acquaintance of Denario’s after being a fundraiser for his project.
With Denario hospitalized her attempted takeover was facilitated. The quality
of 1st party claim handling for the average person was at stake.
Angela had drained the reserve operating capital and took control of Denario’s
personal computer and files. All the files and hardware were sent to her chosen
technology investors. They immediately moved to extrapolate the valuable data. Because
there are intellectual property components that are needed for making a 1st party claim based organizing
App. Ian Xiong discovered that much of the needed data was “gapped”. In
this case his discovery meant that important parts of the data that was taken
from Denario’s laptop were not enough. The first 4 characters of each email
address and contact names were there but not the next 8. Coded phone numbers
and multiple languages were used; this made translation of the business plan
illegible. Angela and her team tried to operate the network, but desperately needed
the map of relationships. It was mate3.com’s game changer security response policies
that caught the takeover of operations. The number of incoming claims dropped
suddenly and the shared revenue decrease followed. The agency that Denario had
set-up was having problems raising funds to pay collectors; never happened before.
Since Angela and her takeover team were
unable to make contact with agents of mate3.com; the network was failing. During
our “Feed The Knowing Data-Exchange Project
of 2013” it became obvious. When the trust triggers were not engaged;
another alarm went off for those in the network. Now that whispers of a change
in power had become validated, multiple claim collectors started organizing to retake
control.
Denario popularized getting advocacy
assistance started from the 1st party claim. He also put an emphasis
on the impacted parties to be the first to issue the recommendations for a
solution; and that’s exactly what happened.
The attempts
for a takeover of the mate3 advocacy assistance network were being rebuffed by
the policies for check and balances. Later in the year Denario regained consciousness
and started submitting answers for mate3.com network; that’s when it was
learned that he was going into physical rehabilitation. As his claimed
experiences and suggestions traveled the networking pipeline; additional
confidence was restored in the scaling up of the mate3.com network.
The
mate3.com network reinforced policies
against 1st party claim theft. The takeover threat had been stopped
by excellent pre-threat security planning. Denario’s skeptical nature was credited
with protecting our network from the hostile takeover. Steven Butu the data
analyst that detected the irregular claim handling by the takeover team passed
away; shortly after his discovery.
Getting back
to stable health took months for Denario, but as time would have it he got back
to moving forward. The work of organizing new behaviors for handling our 1st
party claims is a continuum. Denario had pressed on to host a conference call
where he described the emerging levels of empowerment; for the 1st
party claim. He pointed out that we we’re now able to set the value, rules and
requirement of our 1st party claims; which is the first level
of empowerment. Having the first level of empowerment is your foundation for
creating mutually agreed communication. That’s the kind of relationship with
others that’s needed to scale up cooperation; which is the producer of both
profit and benefits. The second level of empowerment for our 1st
party claims is the ability to set the policies that help us track, audit and
identify when our 1st party claim is being misdirected, manipulated, misaligned
or stolen. The third level of empowerment for the 1st party claim is
the law. Laws that mandate and subject violators to appear in court, show cause
and receive penalties.
The team had become highly
motivated as a result of the attempted takeover. Tools like the accu-point search option were launched to identify the best points for
collecting 1st party claims. The accu-point search service itself has become a
useful tool for collectors to find sources and places to get 1st
party claims. Having the right collection points can reduce the cost to
validate and invalidate reports from 3rd parties. In 2017 Perry Keys
started offering pre-input collection prep-sessions. He was realizing the
potential of long range planning to collect targeted 1st party
claims. Perry was first to see the benefits of getting pre-claim sharing
agreements with potential 1st parties. Perry’s method of pipelining
1st party claims is validating success, saving money and time.
Perry’s work in this area is aiming to directly distribute the collected 1st
party claims to organizers, problem solvers and those with similar claims. His
method has continued to improve problem solving through collecting and adding input
from 1st parties long-range. We can get to the clearer definitions
and best practices for handling the individual input; if we try. As more 1st
party narratives come in they will push us toward greater awareness and more transparency.
We’re
creating the environment for 1st parties to have the freedom to
speak up with authority. Being able to speak up not as a guest but as the MVP. We
work at capturing the impacted person’s claim as close to its original proximity
of occurrence and context. We want the individual claims and experiences to
have a longer life, more uses and a higher value. We offer a growing network of
problem solvers and supporters that can start advocacy assistance from the 1st
party claim. We are people with an intention to solve problems and build
empowering relationships. Pre-mate3 affiliated groups recruit individuals for
networking before they need advocacy support. The mate3.com way of lifting every voice is the more transparent and
the more accountable method to audit 1st party input. Our policy of
requiring mutually agreed communication before representing 1st
party claims is becoming a benchmark of best practices.
The call to
establish uniformed practices for handling of the 1st party claims
of average people; is being fulfilled at mate3.com. We have built affiliation
through common experiences and searches for solutions. By using 1st party claims for
public education we found that it can transform individual claims into
political education. When we discovered the engagement and inspirational value
of 1st party claims we incorporated those values into our organizing
models. The results have been promising for building a critical mass of public
support to formulate mandates for public action.
Your 1st
party claims have value and they require policies to be protected. They have
value to the owner, and should have value to the ones that get them in their
possession. Unfortunately our claims are only as secured as our resolve to
defend them. Our 1st party claims can give direction for problem
solving and activism.
